U.S. Supreme Court rules police need a warrant to search cell phones

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that police must have a warrant to search the content inside a cell phone of a person who has been arrested.

The conclusion is the result of two cases that were brought to the Supreme Court, Riley v. California and U.S. five. Wurie, both of which involved law who searched the content of cell phones of people who had been arrested but without asking for a warrant beforehand.

However, in a decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the ix members of the Supreme Court all agreed that "police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital information on a cell telephone seized from an individual who has been arrested."

The court did state there volition exist a few exceptions to this rule, such every bit cases that involve kidnappings and bomb threats that generate what the judges consider to be "exigent circumstances". Nonetheless, today'south decision finally does offering solid guidance on what the police can and cannot do when they arrest people with prison cell phones.

What do you call back about this new courtroom ruling and do yous support the fact that police will now need to get a warrant earlier they tin search inside the contents of a cell phone?

Source: U.Due south. Supreme Courtroom

This huge Xbox 'Quick Resume' update will give gamers more control

Xbox Insiders Update

This huge Xbox 'Quick Resume' update volition requite gamers more than control

Microsoft is calculation a new feature to Xbox consoles, allowing you to permanently store up to two games in a Quick Resume state at all times. The feature is heading out starting time to Xbox Insiders in the Alpha testing ring before hitting the general public.